– Artur Avila, – Manjul Bhargava,

Martin Hairer, Maryam Mirzakhani

Le congrès international des mathématiciens à Séoul vient d’attribuer à quatre mathématiciens la médaille Fields 2014.

1 – Artur Avila Cordeiro de Melo est né le 29 Juin 1979). Il est français brésilien. Il travaille sur les systèmes dynamiques et la théorie spectrale.

2- Martin Hairer est né le 14 novembre 1975. C’est un mathématicien autrichien. Ses travaux portent sur la théorie des probabilités et les équations aux dérivées partielles stochastiques.

– Pour la première fois le tiers-monde vient d’être honoré doublement. Car c’est une femme iranienne Maryam Mirzakhani (persan : مریم میرزاخانی travaillant aux USA lauréate née en mai 1977. Cette mathématicienne iranienne travaille en topologie et en géométrie des surfaces de Riemann.

– Manjul Bhargava, (hindi: मंजुल भार्गव) né le 8 août 1974 à Hamilton, est un mathématicien indo-canado-américain. C’est un spécialiste de la théorie des nombres.

—————————————————————————————————————————–

Two Letters to Dr. Maryam Mirzakhani

Le mathématicien libanais Rachid Matta Matta écrit à la nouvelle lauréate de la médaille Fields 2014 Maryam Mirzakhani. Nous publions ces deux lettres. L’une date du 20 août 2014, la seconde, le 21 août 2014. Nous souhaitons que ce courrier puisse parvenir à l’université de Standford où travaille la mathématicienne iranienne. Notes de l’éditeur.

Rachid Matta MATTA

Mathematician – Civil Engineer E.C.P.

Tel:+961 71 110592 / +961 3 624134

rachidmattamatta@hotmail.com

http://www.mathtruth-rachidmatta.com

Chers lecteurs,

Je me contente aujourd’hui de placer sur ce site ma lettre électronique à la mathématicienne iranienne Maryam Mirzakhani, et dans le prochain commentaire, j’analyserai ses écrits.

Dr. Maryam Mirzakhani

Congratulation for being the first woman to win the Fields Medals 2014, This prize is an honor for you, for Iran and for the women mathematicians. But this honor can attain its summit, if the competent Iranian mathematician, that you are, achieves her brillant career by supporting the mathematical truth and fighting the error.

A Muslim mathematician knows well that there are eternal truths derived from the First Truth: The Almighty GOD. These eternal truths are given by Euclidean geometry after the rigorous demonstration of Euclid’s fifth postulate, object of my book «Les Méthodes De Démonstrations Du Théorème De La Parallèle», published in 2012,

Dr. Mariam. I worked, hardly, during 50 years to obtain the right proof for the fundamental theorem of geometry. The four methods attached are extracted from the above book and you can see easily their soundness.

1-A very qualified mathematician, like you, understands that Euclidian geometry will become true, and, automatically, the inconsistent Non-Euclidian geometries (hyperbolic and elliptic) collapse. The geometries founded on Non-Euclidean geometries, i e symplectic geometry or any rimanian geometry will collapse,

2- Many flaws are detected in Non-Euclidean geometries, as you can see in the method of Rita and the method of the impossible rotation.

3 – Your scientific probity will push you to recognize my proofs and to propagate them between your colleagues and in the mathematical world.

4 – In my book “ The Number, Neither Reality, Neither Infinity, Nor Continuity, I proved that there is not a length bigger than all the other lengths, Also there is not a number bigger than all the other numbers. Then, mathematical infinite does not exist.

5 – From now on, I hope that you direct all your efforts to produce papers in the true Euclidean geometry and I hope that you accept my critics of some of your papers. My unique aim is to defend the mathematical truth.

I am waiting for your reply and for your opinion on my 4 methods of proving the Parallel Postulate.

Cordially,

Rachid Matta MATTA

8-20-2014

—————————————————————————————————————————————-

Mathematician – Civil Engineer E.C.P.

Tel:+961 71 110592 / +961 3 624134

rachidmattamatta@hotmail.com

http://www.mathtruth-rachidmatta.com

Dr. Maryam Mirzakhani,

I have the honor to send you this second email to attract your attention on the very nature of mathematics. Today, Mathematics finds in your person the right and the best defender of its truths. After winning Fields Medals 2014, you are now in a position to render to Mathematics the eternal truths.

Before developing my conception of Mathematics, I want you to meditate the following passages of Richard Courant and Herbert Robbins in the non-numbred page of their book «What is Mathematics?».

«A serious threat to the very life of science is implied in the assertion that mathematics is nothing but a system of conclusions drawn from definitions and postulates that must be consistent but otherwise may be created by the free will of the mathematician, If this description were accurate, mathematics could not attract any intelligent person. It would be a game with definitions, rules, and syllogisms, without motive or goal. The notion that intellect can create meaningful postulational systems at its whim is a deceptive halftruth. Only under the discipline of responsibility to the organic whole, only guided by intrinsic necessity, can free mind achieve results of scientific value.»

The reaction of R. Courant against the Modern Mathematics is highly justified, since the propositions of Modern Mathematics do not contain any truth about the external world. As a Muslim, you agree with me that the world is created by God and all its phenomena are described by the Euclidean geometry. The big default of Euclidean geometry was the incapacity of mathematicians to find a correct proof for Euclid’s fifth postulate. The founders of Non-Euclidean geometries and their followers haven’t seen the flaws in hyperbolic and elliptic geometries. Two methods between your hands detect these flaws, and I hope that you take the necessary steps so that the mathematical community recognizes the validity of Euclidean geometry.

Your contribution in favor of the geometric truth is essential to teach our students with the true mathematics, whose criteria are:

1) Necessity

2) Immutability

3) Exactness

4) Universality

5) Creator of eternal truths from the first principles discovered by the soul when he is guided by the Almighty GOD.

In the next email, I will expose what happened in geometry and why the Non-Euclidean geometries erupt in the first half of the nineteenth Century.

Saccheri and Lambert made deductions on wrong figures and they have not applied the right logic.

Cordially,

Rachid Matta MATTA

8-21-2014

———————————————————————————————————————————————-

Third email

Mathematician – Civil Engineer E.C.P.

Tel:+961 71 110592 / +961 3 624134

rachidmattamatta@hotmail.com

http://www.mathtruth-rachidmatta.com

Dr. Maryam Mirzakhani,

I have the honor to send you this third email to show the errors committed in the eighteenth Century by Saccheri and Lambert in their deduction on the consequences of the hypothesis of the acute and obtuse angle. These two mathematicians are considered the precursors of the founders of Non-Euclidean geometries.

In the ninteenth Century, Lobatchevski, Bolyai, and Gauss, founders of hyperbolic geometry, had taken the hypothesis of acute angle, and Riemann, founder of elliptic geometry, had taken the hypothesis of obtuse angle. The four mathematicians have not remarqued that their precursors committed a big error.

Saccheri made reasoning on the fundamental quadrilateral having two right angles and two equal sides adjacent to the right angles. His aim was to demonstrate that this quadrilateral is a rectangle. For this reason he developed the hypothesis of the acute and that of obtuse angle hoping find a contradiction in them. He has not seen the contradiction because he has not conducted well the deductions resulting from the hypothesis taken. The hypothesis of the acute angle must laid him to a side at A less than the side at B, (See the figure “Juxtaposition of two fundamental quadrilaterals” sent to you with the first email). The mistake of Saccheri in this hypothesis to consider simultaneously that he has acute angle at C, CD a straight line and passing by D. He has not remarqued that the straight line CD, making acute angle at C with BC, cannot pass by D, but it should pass by a locpoint below D.

Saccheri made the same mistake avec the hypothesis of the obtuse angle at C and D,

Lambert has taken the half of the fundamental quadrilateral of Saccheri. He had also made the same mistake.

Both mathematicians missed the right reasoning.

The errors of Saccheri and Lambert are exposed in my book

«Les Méthodes De Démonstrations Du Théorème De La Parallèle»

In the next email, I will expose the threats endured by geometry and especially by demonstrative geometry during their long history and why the Non-Euclidean geometries erupt in the first half of the nineteenth Century.

Cordially,

Rachid Matta MATTA

8-25-2014

## 4 commentaires

Comments feed for this article

août 20, 2014 à 10:30

Rachid Matta MATTA,

Chers lecteurs,

Je me contente aujourd’hui de de placer sur ce site ma lettre électronique à la mathématicienne iranienne Maryam Mirzakhani, et dans le prochain commentaire, j’analyserai ses écrits.

Rachid Matta MATTA

Mathematician – Civil Engineer E.C.P.

Tel:+961 71 110592 / +961 3 624134

rachidmattamatta@hotmail.com

http://www.mathtruth-rachidmatta.com

Dr. Maryam Mirzakhani

Congratulation for being the first woman to win the Fields Medals 2014, This prize is an honor for you, for Iran and for the women mathematicians. But this honor can attain its summit, if the competent Iranian mathematician, that you are, achieves her brillant career by supporting the mathematical truth and fighting the error.

A Muslim mathematician knows well that there are eternal truths derived from the First Truth: The Almighty GOD. These eternal truths are given by Euclidean geometry after the rigorous demonstration of Euclid’s fifth postulate, object of my book «Les Méthodes De Démonstrations Du Théorème De La Parallèle», published in 2012,

Dr. Mariam. I worked, hardly, during 50 years to obtain the right proof for the fundamental theorem of geometry. The four methods attached are extracted from the above book and you can see easily their soundness.

1-A very qualified mathematician, like you, understands that Euclidian geometry will become true, and, automatically, the inconsistent Non-Euclidian geometries (hyperbolic and elliptic) collapse. The geometries founded on Non-Euclidean geometries, i e symplectic geometry or any rimanian geometry will collapse,

2- Many flaws are detected in Non-Euclidean geometries, as you can see in the method of Rita and the method of the impossible rotation.

3 – Your scientific probity will push you to recognize my proofs and to propagate them between your colleagues and in the mathematical world.

4 – In my book “ The Number, Neither Reality, Neither Infinity, Nor Continuity, I proved that there is not a length bigger than all the other lengths, Also there is not a number bigger than all the other numbers. Then, mathematical infinite does not exist.

5 – From now on, I hope that you direct all your efforts to produce papers in the true Euclidean geometry and I hope that you accept my critics of some of your papers. My unique aim is to defend the mathematical truth.

I am waiting for your reply and for your opinion on my 4 methods of proving the Parallel Postulate.

Cordially,

Rachid Matta MATTA

8-20-2014

août 21, 2014 à 9:38

Rachid Matta MATTARachid Matta MATTA

Mathematician – Civil Engineer E.C.P.

Tel:+961 71 110592 / +961 3 624134

rachidmattamatta@hotmail.com

http://www.mathtruth-rachidmatta.com

Dr. Maryam Mirzakhani,

I have the honor to send you this second email to attract your attention on the very nature of mathematics. Today, Mathematics finds in your person the right and the best defender of its truths. After winning Fields Medals 2014, you are now in a position to render to Mathematics the eternal truths.

Before developing my conception of Mathematics, I want you to meditate the following passages of Richard Courant and Herbert Robbins in the non-numbred page of their book «What is Mathematics?».

«A serious threat to the very life of science is implied in the assertion that mathematics is nothing but a system of conclusions drawn from definitions and postulates that must be consistent but otherwise may be created by the free will of the mathematician, If this description were accurate, mathematics could not attract any intelligent person. It would be a game with definitions, rules, and syllogisms, without motive or goal. The notion that intellect can create meaningful postulational systems at its whim is a deceptive halftruth. Only under the discipline of responsibility to the organic whole, only guided by intrinsic necessity, can free mind achieve results of scientific value.»

The reaction of R. Courant against the Modern Mathematics is highly justified, since the propositions of Modern Mathematics do not contain any truth about the external world. As a Muslim, you agree with me that the world is created by God and all its phenomena are described by the Euclidean geometry. The big default of Euclidean geometry was the incapacity of mathematicians to find a correct proof for Euclid’s fifth postulate. The founders of Non-Euclidean geometries and their followers haven’t seen the flaws in hyperbolic and elliptic geometries. Two methods between your hands detect these flaws, and I hope that you take the necessary steps so that the mathematical community recognizes the validity of Euclidean geometry.

Your contribution in favor of the geometric truth is essential to teach our students with the true mathematics, whose criteria are:

1) Necessity

2) Immutability

3) Exactness

4) Universality

5) Creator of eternal truths from the first principles discovered by the soul when he is guided by the Almighty GOD.

In the next email, I will expose what happened in geometry and why the Non-Euclidean geometries erupt in the first half of the nineteenth Century.

Saccheri and Lambert made deductions on wrong figures and they have not applied the right logic.

Cordially,

Rachid Matta MATTA

8-21-2014

août 26, 2014 à 5:22

Rachid Matta MATTAThird email

Rachid Matta MATTA

Mathematician – Civil Engineer E.C.P.

Tel:+961 71 110592 / +961 3 624134

rachidmattamatta@hotmail.com

http://www.mathtruth-rachidmatta.com

Dr. Maryam Mirzakhani,

I have the honor to send you this third email to show the errors committed in the eighteenth Century by Saccheri and Lambert in their deduction on the consequences of the hypothesis of the acute and obtuse angle. These two mathematicians are considered the precursors of the founders of Non-Euclidean geometries.

In the ninteenth Century, Lobatchevski, Bolyai, and Gauss, founders of hyperbolic geometry, had taken the hypothesis of acute angle, and Riemann, founder of elliptic geometry, had taken the hypothesis of obtuse angle. The four mathematicians have not remarqued that their precursors committed a big error.

Saccheri made reasoning on the fundamental quadrilateral having two right angles and two equal sides adjacent to the right angles. His aim was to demonstrate that this quadrilateral is a rectangle. For this reason he developed the hypothesis of the acute and that of obtuse angle hoping find a contradiction in them. He has not seen the contradiction because he has not conducted well the deductions resulting from the hypothesis taken. The hypothesis of the acute angle must laid him to a side at A less than the side at B, (See the figure “Juxtaposition of two fundamental quadrilaterals” sent to you with the first email). The mistake of Saccheri in this hypothesis to consider simultaneously that he has acute angle at C, CD a straight line and passing by D. He has not remarqued that the straight line CD, making acute angle at C with BC, cannot pass by D, but it should pass by a locpoint below D.

Saccheri made the same mistake avec the hypothesis of the obtuse angle at C and D,

Lambert has taken the half of the fundamental quadrilateral of Saccheri. He had also made the same mistake.

Both mathematicians missed the right reasoning.

The errors of Saccheri and Lambert are exposed in my book

«Les Méthodes De Démonstrations Du Théorème De La Parallèle»

In the next email, I will expose the threats endured by geometry and especially by demonstrative geometry during their long history and why the Non-Euclidean geometries erupt in the first half of the nineteenth Century.

Cordially,

Rachid Matta MATTA

8-25-2014

septembre 2, 2014 à 4:12

Rachid Matta MATTAAvec ces deux lettres se termine ma correspondance en Anglais avec le professeur Maryam Mirzakhani

Mathematician – Civil Engineer E.C.P.

Tel:+961 71 110592 / +961 3 624134

rachidmattamatta@hotmail.com

http://www.mathtruth-rachidmatta.com

Dr. Maryam Mirzakhani,

I have the honor to send you this fourth email to expose the threats endured by geometry and especially by demonstrative geometry during their long history.

1) – Geometry is not a practical science measuring the earth, but it is the science of the necessary and eternal truths.

2) – Since the sixth Century, the introduction of mathematical infinite to measure the length of a circle or the diagonal of a square affected the true nature of geometry.

3) – The absence of a right proof for the fundamental theorem, known as the parallel postulate or Euclid’s fifth postulate, was unacceptable for the demonstrative science.

4) – The introduction of projective geometry was a big error, because there are no points or straight line at infinity. The space is infinite, but everything existing in this space is finite.

5) – The Geometry of Descartes (Analytic geometry) had considered illegally that numbers are continuous. Numbers are always discrete.

6) – With the Non-Euclidean geometries, the geometry sinks to the bottom of the Ocean of errors. Geometry lost its celestial identity, the true nature of its beings, and its eternal truths.

7) The basic beings, like the straight line and the plane surface, lost their exactness. I cite Greenberg

«To prove Meta-mathematical Theorem 1, we have to again ask ourselves, What is a “line” in hyperbolic geometry- in fact, what is the hyperbolic plane? The honest answer is that we don’t know: it is just an abstraction. A hyperbolic line is an undefined term describing an abstract concept that resemble the concept of an Euclidean line except for its parallelism properties.»

I give as example the official French definition of the straight line in 1972.

La définition officielle qui fut infligée à tous les élèves de 4ème de France et de Navarre en 1972, par la circulaire numéro 71 370 du ministère de l’Education nationale.

« On appelle droite un ensemble D d’éléments dits points, muni

d’une bijection g de D sur R, et de toutes celles f qui s’en déduisent de la manière suivante : a étant un nombre réel arbitraire, on a : soit f(M) = g(M)+a, soit f(M) = – g(M)+a. La famille des bijections f s’appelle une structure euclidienne. Si M, M’ sont deux points de D, le nombre positif d(MM0) = [f(M’) – f(M)] ne dépend pas du choix de f et par suite ne dépend que de la structure euclidienne de D : d(M;M’) est la distance des deux points M et M’.»

As you see, it is a ridiculous definition.

8) – All the geometries based on Non-Euclidean geometries, or using the mathematical infinite, are wrong.

Cordially,

Rachid Matta MATTA

9-2-2014

Fifth Email

Dr. Maryam Mirzakhani,

I have the honor to send you this fifth and last email, to draw a lesson from the four precedent emails. Any wise and honest mathematician, like you, cannot accept the error in mathematics and, especially, in its fundamental science: geometry. He will agree easily with the following items:

1) If ignoring the validity of Euclidean geometry was tolerated before proving Euclid’s fifth postulate from now on it is not tolerated to ignore this validity. One of the four methods sent to you attached to the first email, is sufficient to rank the parallel postulate between the theorems rigorously demonstrated by Euclid in his “Elements”.

2) The flaws discovered in Non-Euclidean geometries by my methods must push you to reject these fictive geometries and to reject all geometry using the Non-Euclidean geometries.

3) All mathematical writings on Non-Euclidean geometries must be stopped and also the teaching of them.

4) The introduction of the eternal truths in the field of mathematics offers to the students the true geometry, the true arithmetic, and the true algebra.

5) The reasons of the students, formed correctly by the true mathematics, will open a new era for humanity.

6) The Absolute truths put an end to the empiricism and the skepticism,

7) The existence of Eternal truth leads to the existence of the Almighty GOD. You and I are lucky to believe in GOD. This GOD inspires your soul that Euclidean geometry is the unique true geometry which describes all the forms and facts of the universe.

8) The principles of geometry cannot be proposed by the free will of the mathematician, but they must be discovered by the soul guided by GOD.

9) Your position in the mathematical community, after winning the Field Medals, puts on your shoulders the great responsibility to propagate the truth of Euclidean geometry. I hope that the qualified Iranian mathematician will push her colleagues to recognize the rigorous proofs which found correctly the geometry.

10) I expect that you will not act like the injured mathematicians and that you reply to my emails as will do any mathematician possessing the intellectual honesty and the scientific probity.

Best Regards

Rachid Matta MATTA

9-2-2014